16

Interviewed for a Q&A position.

Found bugs and errors on the test questions just fine.

Found broken assets and errors within the test itself outside of the questions. (Misspellings, typos, broken images, botched styling, etc.)

Didn't get hired because they thought I'd spend too much time finding bugs.

What gives?

Comments
  • 4
    uhhh... isn't that the point, to optimize and swat those bugs XD

    I'd say that's a dodged bullet
  • 1
    agree with @tisaconundrum
  • 2
    probably felt embarrased that you found their own typos, lol

    i second what @tisaconundrum said
  • 0
    Oh I dodged it for sure. That was about 3 years ago. ;)
  • 1
    @amjo isn't why they wanting to hire him/her in thr first place. to find bugs!
  • 1
    @thedev correct, but unlike the employeers, employees interviewing them (not mecessarily the hr) fear competition. its a bad thing of course, but they usually look for someone who'd submit rather than innovate and take initiatives. again, im with you, but this is how things turn out practically (unfortunately)
  • 2
    @amjo you are right.
Add Comment