How the heck can Twitter's algorithms for selecting "Who to follow" and "Trends" suggestions? I tweet exclusively (but rarely) about tech, but Twitter seems to think that loudmouthed SJWs would be the perfect people for a tech tweeter to follow.

FFS, intersectional gender studies from a class struggle perspective are not of the slightest interest to a techie.

Maybe Twitter just selects the most frequent tweeters in you area, regardless of content.

And here we see why people complain about the lack of interdisciplinary minds in tech, and reinforcement of the stereotype that all a techie can aspire to be is a code monkey. Conveniently, these are also class issues. ;)

@Charlaxy You have understood absolutely nothing in my rant.

If Twitter had suggested a variety of personalities, like chefs, racing drivers, painters etc that would be a random element outside any "search bubbles". But it hasn't. It's all there in the original rant, had you bothered to comprehend it.

Also, I don't find buying into pseudo science nonsense is the least bit interdisciplinary, whether it be Hahnemann or the Adorno/Marcuse nonsense referred to in my post. For an example or something that's interdisciplinary for real, check out the backgrounds of the original Mac team.

@Grumpy I think it's being implied that it might be good to follow other things that aren't tech is all (although i am not sure your suggestions are in any way good)